Spring Rota 2026
Compliance findings
Average weekly hours approach the 48-hour statutory limit
Working blocks total approximately 51.5 hours gross per week (46.5 hours net after breaks). The 17-week reference period average sits within the statutory limit, but the margin is narrow. Where workers have not signed individual opt-out agreements under WTR 1998 Schedule 1, this pattern carries risk of exceeding the limit during periods of higher activity such as bank holidays or sickness cover.
Confirm that all affected workers have signed individual opt-out agreements. If opt-outs are not in place, consider reducing shift duration or block length to create additional headroom below the 48-hour threshold.
Late-to-early transitions present high fatigue risk
5 instances identified across the rota period where a shift ends at or after 23:00 and is followed within 36 hours by a shift starting at or before 07:00. Affected workers include Alex Reid, Sam Okafor, and Jordan Byrne. HSE guidance HSG256 identifies this transition pattern as carrying elevated fatigue risk — the combination of late finish and early return compresses sleep opportunity and disrupts circadian rhythm. This finding is separate from and additional to the legal assessment under WTR 1998.
Where possible, avoid scheduling early starts within 36 hours of a late finish. Where this pattern is unavoidable, consider extending the rest period, reviewing the overall block structure, or implementing additional fatigue controls.
Effective recovery shorter than the scheduled rest period suggests
3 instances identified where late-finishing blocks (ending at or after 01:00) are followed by early-returning blocks (starting before 06:00) after a nominal rest period. Effective recovery in these transitions is approximately 3.3–3.5 days rather than the full scheduled rest, because the first and last rest days are partially consumed by the preceding late finish and preparation for the early return. Casey Mbeki and Morgan Ellis are both affected by this pattern.
Where possible, follow late-finishing blocks with later-starting return shifts. Even a modest delay to the first shift after a rest period significantly improves effective recovery and reduces cumulative fatigue.
High fatigue risk profile across the majority of scheduled shifts
68% of shifts across this rota period score above the high-risk threshold of 50/100 under HSE HSG256 fatigue scoring. The average score is 54.2/100. 5% of shifts score in the very high risk band (75+/100). This pattern of sustained elevated fatigue risk may engage the employer's duty under HSWA 1974 Section 2 to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of employees. Under MHSWR 1999 Regulation 3, a suitable and sufficient risk assessment covering fatigue risks associated with this shift pattern is recommended.
Commission a fatigue risk assessment for this shift pattern. Review whether the proportion of high-risk shifts can be reduced through pattern redesign, additional rest days, or revised start and finish times. Document the outcome of any risk assessment.
HSG256 Fatigue summary
Scored per shift: 0 = no risk, 100 = maximum risk
Guidance only — not legal advice. Seek independent legal or HR advice before taking action.
Ready to check your rota?
Upload your own shift data and get a full compliance report in seconds. Free to start — no card required.
Want to see which shifts to fix?
The Business plan annotation view overlays every violation directly on your rota — shift by shift, worker by worker, with inline fix suggestions.
See exactly which shifts to fix
Violations overlaid directly on your rota — shift by shift, worker by worker, with inline fix suggestions.